Skip to content
Baseworks KB

One more time... — curated notes

Created 2026-05-09
Type curated-notes
Status posted
Tags primer-communitycurated-notesforumnathalie-dorelesson-7-9ignitioncueingattentionbody-awareness

Persistent sidecar for the auto-synced topic at 2026-05-09-one-more-time. The forum content sync rewrites the topic file on every cycle, so the reply text, tag list, and editorial notes live here.

Topic context: Primer Community, Segment 7, Lesson 7.9 (Practice Session – Complete). Nathalie observed that “one more time” implies finality to her brain, and she experiences a sense of betrayal when the movement continues past it. The post title “One more time…” is a self-aware play on that exact feeling.

Tags applied to topic 22256

Section titled “Tags applied to topic 22256”
7.9. Practice Session – Complete, Baseworks Movement Patterns, Body Awareness,
Proprioceptive Awareness, Cueing

From the Forum Tag Shortlist:

  • Baseworks Movement Patterns (710)
  • Body Awareness (698)
  • Proprioceptive Awareness (734)

New tags created on this topic:

  • “7.9. Practice Session – Complete” (861) — lesson-specific, auto-synced from lesson structure
  • Cueing (862) — new general tag for topics about verbal cueing and instruction language; expected to recur

Reply as posted

Section titled “Reply as posted”
@nathalie.dore


That's a precise observation about what cueing language does. "One more time" carries
a completion signal that "again" doesn't, and when the movement continues past it, the
brain has to reorient.


In the Primer lessons, the intention is that "one more time" means exactly one more
complete repetition. If you've found otherwise in a specific lesson, let us know which
one and we'll take a look. When you flag something like this, it helps a great deal if
you can include the exact timestamp in the video, the minutes and seconds of the moment
you're referring to. The more specific the reference, the better we can address it.


The observation connects to a broader aspect of the practice: when a cue signals that
the end is near, part of the attention begins organizing around what comes next rather
than what's happening in the current repetition. That's the same kind of attention split
that comes up whenever something new activates: one area draws focus while another fades.
Holding full attention on the present repetition, regardless of what you've just been
told about the count, is something the practice works toward.


One more ask about tagging: we know it's faster to drop a question in without stopping
to add tags, and we don't want that to hold back your posts. But the tags are what make
the forum searchable over time, including via the platform's search. The screenshot below
shows where the tag field is on the lesson page, right below the content area before you
hit Post. Please consider making it a habit each time you post.


[screenshot: https://media.baseworks.com/website/bw-forum-tag-field-discussion-tab.png]

Posting record

Section titled “Posting record”
  • Posted: 2026-05-09 via WP-CLI from Patrick’s Mac (reply ID 22259).
  • Tags applied: 5 tags via wp post term set --by=id on topic 22256.
  • Cache: Flushed via wp cache flush.
  • Screenshot: Uploaded to B2/CDN at https://media.baseworks.com/website/bw-forum-tag-field-discussion-tab.png. WP uploads directory (2026/05/) was root-owned and not writable via SSH user; CDN path used instead.
  • post_parent fix: bbp_insert_reply() created reply with post_parent = 0; fixed via direct UPDATE areb_posts SET post_parent = 22256 query. Confirmed in DB.
  • @mention notification status: Not fired (known WP-CLI limitation — atwho markup renders the link visually but the BB activity bridge does not fire from CLI). Patrick should open the reply in the BuddyBoss UI and do a minor edit-and-save to fire the @mention notification to Nathalie.

Editorial refinements

Section titled “Editorial refinements”

1. Tag reminder addressed directly to Nathalie, not as a community-wide note. Prior tag reminders (04-22 Nathalie reply, 04-26 James reply) were closing paragraphs addressed to “everyone reading.” This reply addresses Nathalie by name in the tag reminder paragraph, since this is now the second direct ask. The shift in framing signals that this is a personal request, not a general nudge.

2. Timestamp request integrated naturally after the “let us know” clause. The request to include a video timestamp (“the minutes and seconds of the moment you’re referring to”) was added immediately after inviting Nathalie to flag the specific lesson. This positioning makes it feel like practical guidance rather than a separate ask.

3. Cueing language observation connected to the broader attention-distribution principle. The reply uses Nathalie’s “one more time” observation as an entry point into the broader principle: anticipatory cues (signaling an ending) distribute attention toward what comes next, away from the present repetition. This is the same mechanism as a new body activation pulling focus. Framed without referencing her private segment feedback (which noted the same split in the upper/lower body context).

Cross-reference

Section titled “Cross-reference”
Section titled “Related”