Skip to content

Emergence

Created 2026-03-18
Tags coredefinitionsconcept

The key scientific claim about Baseworks is that its focus on perceptual skills was not designed — it emerged. The iterative refinement process was driven by the pragmatic question “how do we get everybody to perform the same movements?” It was not driven by a theory about perceptual training or sensorimotor neuroscience. Yet the method converged on techniques that:

  • increase sensory signal (DA: widespread low-level co-contraction generates proprioceptive input that would otherwise remain below conscious threshold)
  • maintain sensory clarity and prevent habituation (MM: continuous subtle adjustments keep sensory channels active)
  • provide explicit spatial reference frames that reduce movement goal ambiguity (GS, FSA: gridlines and step-by-step isolation specify degrees of freedom that are normally left uncontrolled)
  • prevent conditions that degrade sensory access (NB, IM: keeping arousal low and intensity manageable preserves the conditions for sensory discrimination)

This convergence is what makes Baseworks a naturalistic model system (or “model object”) for sensorimotor research: a real-world practice that independently arrived at principles predicted by motor control theories (Cisek’s affordance competition hypothesis, Grossberg’s Adaptive Resonance Theory), without being designed from those theories. This gives it a different epistemic status from a top-down designed intervention — it is closer to a natural phenomenon that confirms a theory than to an experiment that tests one.

Emergence as used here — the scientific claim that Baseworks’ focus on perceptual skills emerged from iterative refinement without being designed — is distinct from Emergent Outcome, which refers to the broader phenomenon of an attainment recognized retrospectively only after it has been achieved.